Supreme Court Rejects Plaintiffs Fighting NY Govt School Jab Mandates

The Court majority rejected religious objections, reaffirming horrific assumptions of state power over body and soul.

Here’s the story, as laid out by Bloomberg’s Greg Stohr…

“The US Supreme Court turned away a challenge to New York’s requirement that schoolchildren be vaccinated against serious diseases, refusing to question the state’s 2019 repeal of its longstanding exemption for families with religious objections.”

Which, before we dig further, requires some analysis of the reportage, itself.

In this case, the NY statute and the pushback do not pertain to COVID19 and the fraudulent use of the terms “serious disease” and “vaccine” when applied to COVID19 and the mRNA gene-vector injections.

Of the original case called FF. V New York, Michael Gryboski writes for Chistian Times:

“In June 2019, then-New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed a bill removing religious exemptions for vaccines in schoolchildren. Under the law, children may not attend school or day care in New York without certification from a healthcare provider that the child has received all mandated vaccinations. 

The law was passed amid a Measles outbreak impacting dozens of states. While providing medical exemptions, the law no longer allows exemptions for students whose parents or guardians hold genuine religious beliefs that do not permit the child to receive the vaccinations.”

And he adds:

“A group of families identified by initials, who held various religious objections to vaccinations, filed the lawsuit against the state on behalf of their minor children, contending that the policy forced them to either violate their beliefs or homeschool their children.”

These parents have powerful objections, and the use of fetal HEK cells taken from aborted children, the immorality of forced schooling, and the immorality of taxation, are essential components of the valid fight against not just the jab mandate, but the state-schools and the state (in its universal, normative form) itself.

Notes Gryboski:

"’In lobbying for its passage, numerous legislators publicly mocked and ridiculed those seeking religious exemptions for their children, and the legislature left intact a medical exemption,’ the parents' appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court reads. ‘And there is no dispute the repeal has put tens of thousands of students to the Hobson’s choice of violating their sincerely-held religious beliefs or being denied the right to attend any manner of in-person schooling.’"

Bloomberg’s Stohr reports:

“A group of parents challenged the 2019 repeal, saying it violated their rights under the Constitution’s First Amendment and was driven by anti-religious bias. They faulted the state for removing the religious exemption while allowing other people -- including students over 18, adults who work for schools and children with medical exemptions -- to go unvaccinated.

The parents said they were forced to either violate their religious beliefs or home-school their children.

‘The results are devastating -- tens of thousands of children have been deprived the ability to attend school without violating their sincerely-held religious beliefs,’ the parents argued.”

So, from this immediate case, here are longer-standing and more universal points to remember…

By its nature, government-run schooling deprives every taxpayer of his or her rights. The forced-collectivization of pedagogy and policy prevent people from making choices with their own funds, and the elimination of those choices prevents market preferences to guide potential private providers of teaching and other services to new participation in a consumer-based education market.

This problem is endemic and systemic within all government systems, and undergirds every analysis of every political plan, but, let’s return to the case at hand.

Writes Stohr:

“The justices without comment left in place a state court ruling that said New York wasn’t targeting religion when it eliminated the exemption after the worst measles outbreak in a quarter century. The vaccine requirement applies to children under 18 in both public and private schools.

The rebuff is consistent with the Supreme Court’s handling of cases involving Covid-19 vaccines. The justices have let state and local government impose shot requirements even without the type of religious opt-out the court has required in other contexts -- for example, with regard to Obamacare’s contraceptive mandate.”

The jurisprudential wellspring of this is the insane 1905 Supreme Court decision in a case called Jacobson v. Massachusetts, a ruling that saw the court invent a “public health police power” for states that doesn’t exist, and a ruling that soon saw politicians in Indiana pass a law allowing for the forced sterilization of people the state deemed “feeble-minded”, and subsequently saw 30,000+ people sterilized in 29 states between 1907 and 1939.

Shortly thereafter, the practice of U.S. politicians and bureaucrats claiming a “public health police power” to control citizens became so widespread that Adolf Hitler took notice, writing:

“There is today one state in which at least weak beginnings toward a better conception [of citizenship] are noticeable. Of course, it is not our model German Republic, but the United States.” 

All that, thanks to one group of people misreading the Constitution and others claiming power.

Just as the SCOTUS and NY have done in this contemporary case.

Then there’s the tired old nostrum of “general welfare” – a term that, more on the federal level than the state level, leftists often trot out to try to excuse virtually any illegitimate expansion of federal power they desire.

The so-called “General Welfare Clause” doesn’t spell out any enumerated “power.” The Constitution specifies the branches, enumerated “powers,” and amendments, and lays out how the Founders intended these goals to be achieved. By setting the goal of promoting the “General Welfare” they meant prosperity through voluntary market exchange, not redistribution of wealth or mandates of vaccination, since that makes all residents potential targets for government aggression, and runs counter to the goal of insuring liberty, justice, or the “protection” of property and liberty against attacks by other people -- the so-called rationale for the state itself.

Of course, the state does not really “protect” anyone. It threatens people and takes their stuff in order to fund this supposed “protection force” – i.e. the state is a protection racket based on aggression and threats. Even if there were some “power” in the US Constitution claiming that politicians could forcibly inject people, no such moral authority ever could be claimed. Not one of us explicitly signed on to the Constitution. The US government, like all government, is forced on us, and no one can claim that we “tacitly” accept its rule simply because we don’t flee to some other locale.

I never signed the US Constitution, and it is not a “contract” that applies to me. The tax-eaters occupying federal and state offices are the ones who swear oaths to “protect and defend” their US Constitution (and their NY Constitution, in the case of the state parasites).

And the Justices and NY officials (such as former Governor, Andrew Cuomo) show a lot of gall claiming that his kind of mandate is not an infringement of the First Amendment. Not only are the plaintiffs completely correct, the use of state funds to buy vaccines made via the use of aborted babies’ cells is, itself, an infringement of the First Amendment. – The whole state apparatus is an infringement of the First Amendment – because the state is predicated on theft, and many, if not most, religions prohibit theft.

Thus, paying to support a machine of aggression and robbery is a breach of religious belief.

Of course, recognition of the immorality of the state isn’t on the SCOTUS docket. And you’ll be forced to keep paying for the Court, the feds, and your state and local politicians and bureaucrats, even as they crush every essence of your moral sovereignty.

Thank you for reading this information and, if you do, for subscribing or sharing! Find Gard on Twitter as @GardGoldsmith and on Gab as @GardnerGoldsmith. Find Gard’s work for MRCTV at MRCTV.ORG and on MRCTV’s YouTube and Rumble Channels, and find Gard’s Liberty Conspiracy material at Rumble, Odysee, and Bitchute! Be Seeing You!